Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 586-590, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-912328

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the results of surgical valvuloplasty and balloon dilation in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) at our center.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of children diagnosed with AS, underwent aortic repair or balloon dilation from January 2008 to December 2019. Seeking to analyze the early and long-term valvular function, evaluate mortality and freedom from reoperation by Kaplan- Meier method and figure out the risk factors by logistic regression. Results:There were 116 patients having received surgical valvuloplasty (SAV) and 64 having received balloon dilation (BD). There were no significant differences between two groups respect to median age, weight, preoperative peek gradient, aortic insufficient degree, left ventricular ejection fraction left ventricular end-diastolic dimension Z-score and aortic anulus diameter Z-score ( P>0.05). SAV achieved better gradient reduction and freedom from reoperation than did BD. The mean follow-up time was (5.2±3.1) years in SAV and (4.5±2.1) years in BD. Survival at 10 year was comparable between 2 groups ( P=0.51). Freedom from reoperation at 10 years was 59.6% in SAV and 49.7% in BD respectively ( P=0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that BD contributed to subsequent reoperation ( P=0.05). Conclusion:SAV and BD both significantly relieved aortic stenosis and obtained good survival benefit. SAV yielded better gradient reduction and lower reoperation risk. BD might increase the hazard of reoperation.

2.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 675-681, 2021.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-881242

ABSTRACT

@#Objective    To explore the experience of surgical repair for congenital aortic stenosis (AS) in our center. Methods    We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 145 children diagnosed with AS, who underwent aortic repair from 2008 to 2019, with or without aortic insufficiency (AI), including 104 males and 41 females with a median age of 2.9 (0.6, 7.8) years. The preoperative and intraoperative data, early and long-term valvular function, long-term survival rate and freedom from reoperation and aortic valve replacment (AVR) were analyzed. Results    There were 120 patients receiving commissurotomy, 15 valvuloplasty with extra pericardium patch, and 25 AVR. The mean follow-up time was 0.25-11.20 (4.2±2.8) years. Survival rate at 10 years was 92.3%. Freedom from reoperation and AVR was 63.2% and 60.4%respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that using a patch during surgery (P=0.036) was an independent risk factor for reoperation. A history of preoperative balloon dilation (P=0.029) and significant preoperative AI (P=0.001) contributed to AVR. Conclusion    Surgical treatment of congenital aortic valve stenosis in children is a safe and effective method that provides enough time to achieve a more definitive solution. Using a patch during surgery increases reoperation hazard. A history of previous balloon dilation and significant preoperative AI may result in AVR during the follow-up.

3.
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 829-833, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-731909

ABSTRACT

@#Objective To analyze the midterm outcome of patients with congenital aortic stenosis undergoing percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) by single echocardiographic guidance. Methods The clinical data of 12 patients with congenital aortic stenosis who underwent PBAV by single echocardiographic guidance at Fuwai Hospital from January 2016 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 7 males and 5 females with an average age of 18.27±15.30 years. The preoperative peak pressure gradient was 61.8–110.0 (80.30±24.50) mm Hg, and 50% of patients had aortic regurgitation. Results All patients successfully underwent PBAV. Aortic annulus diameter was 18.65±3.17 mm and balloon diameter was 17.62±3.77 mm, with balloon diameter to annulus diameter ratio of 0.92±0.07. The peak transaortic gradient was 16-51 (36.72±12.33) mm Hg immediately after procedure, which was significantly different from the preoperation (P=0.000). During the follow-up period, the peak transaortic gradient was 21-58 (37.06±13.52) mm Hg, and there was no significant difference between the follow-up and immediate postoperation (P=0.310). Immediately after procedure and during follow-up, 58% of patients had aortic regurgitation, which was not statistically different from the preoperation (P=0.682). Conclusion Systematic use of Doppler echocardiographic guidance for PBAV is feasible, and that it is associated with a high success rate and a very low complication rate.

4.
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society ; : 167-176, 2001.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-162930

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to investigate the results of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in congenital aortic stenosis(CAS) and, especially, to compare the results between BAV performed before two months of age(Group A) and BAV after two month of age(Group B). METHODS: From January 1993 to June 2000, 14 patients who were diagnosed as CAS were treated with BAV. Indications for BAV were 1) critical aortic stenosis and 2) a peak-to-peak systolic pressure gradient in excess of 50mmHg or a gradient > OR =40mmHg with either symptoms or EKG changes. RESULTS: In Group A, the procedures were performed through femoral artery, carotid, or femoral vein approach. In Group B, however, all procedures were performed through femoral artery approach. After the BAV, a peak-to-peak systolic pressure gradient was reduced from 66.5+/-31.3 mmHg to 30.1+/-15.5mmHg(Group A; from 42.3+/-23.8mmHg to 22.0+/-15.3mmHg, Group B; from 88.9+/-16.8mmHg to 38.1+/-11.5mmHg). Repeated BAV were tried in 3 of these cases. There were 3 mortality cases in Group A. One of them was related with the procedure. CONCLUSION: The result of BAV after 2 months of age is acceptable, but that before 2 months of age is not satisfactory. However this result of BAV on early infants is thought to be mainly related to the poor pre-BAV conditions. So BAV may still be considered as a first intervention for CAS in this period. In such cases, other approachs rather than femoral artery should be considered.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Blood Pressure , Electrocardiography , Femoral Artery , Femoral Vein , Mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL